Bring data and AI to hiring, retention and workforce decisions.
AI for HR Analytics and Decision Making shows how people data, used well, sharpens workforce decisions — and how, used carelessly, it does harm. You build models for the core HR problems: predicting attrition, screening and matching talent, and forecasting workforce needs, working with realistic HR data. Running through the course is an unavoidable theme: fairness, bias and privacy, because HR models decide people’s livelihoods and face growing legal scrutiny. You finish able to build HR analytics that are useful, defensible and fair. A verified e-Certificate of competency and e-Marksheet from the Deep Science & Technology Consortium.
This course applies AI to human-resources analytics — talent acquisition, attrition prediction, performance and workforce planning — with a strong focus on fairness.
1. Analyse HR data for workforce insight.
2. Build attrition-prediction and retention models.
3. Apply AI to talent screening and matching.
4. Forecast workforce and capacity needs.
5. Audit HR models for fairness, bias and privacy.
• HR and people-analytics professionals
• Data scientists working with workforce data
• HR technology and operations teams
• Students specialising in people analytics
• The ability to build defensible HR analytics.
• An attrition or workforce-planning project.
• A fairness-first approach to people data.
• A verified e-Certificate of competency and e-Marksheet from the Deep Science & Technology Consortium.
• HR data sources, quality problems and small-sample realities
• Employee privacy expectations and works-council or union considerations
• Distinguishing questions worth answering from surveillance dressed as analytics
• Turnover, mobility and time-to-hire measured without misleading denominators
• Compensation analysis and pay-equity testing with appropriate controls
• Segmentation that does not become proxy discrimination
• Attrition modelling, its weak signal and the ethics of acting on it
• Performance prediction and the contaminated-label problem
• Causal thinking: intervention effects rather than correlational risk scores
• Resume screening and structured assessment, and documented adverse impact
• Four-fifths rule testing and bias audit requirements such as NYC Local Law 144
• Candidate notice, explanation and appeal rights
• Presenting uncertainty to managers who want a single number
• Human review requirements for consequential employment decisions
• Monitoring deployed tools for drift and disparate outcomes
| Parameter | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Covered Tool / Platform | Python |
| Covered Tool / Platform | TensorFlow |
| Covered Tool / Platform | PyTorch |
| Covered Tool / Platform | Keras |
| Covered Tool / Platform | Scikit-learn |
| Covered Tool / Platform | Jupyter Notebook |
| Covered Tool / Platform | Google Colab |
| Covered Tool / Platform | Hugging Face |
Based on 0 scholar submissions
No verified reviews published yet. Be the first to share your academic experience.
Your rating will help prospective scholars. Ratings below 3 stars are routed privately to the faculty mentor for immediate response.